|
When Barry Greenstein was eliminated from the $10,000 Pot
Limit Omaha event, it was obvious there was tension between himself and the
player who eliminated him, Simon ‘Aces’ Trumper. With Greenstein on full tilt
over the incident, Trumper responded the following day with a very different
version of what actually took place. Who to believe? You’ll have to decide for
yourself.
After Greenstein’s very unflattering description of the
scene at the table, and in fact of Simon Trumper himself, Trumper has sat down
and provided his version of the events. First off, according to Aces, the
delay which Barry has characterized as “10 minutes” wasn’t anywhere near that.
But instead of offering a time frame of the raise, Simon insisted the
tournament director survey the players at the table himself. The tournament
director surveyed four other players at the table. Huck Seed, Barny Boatman,
Tommy Grimes and Peter Costa all seemed to support Simon’s claim, with each
player suggesting the delay was closer to two and a half minutes. Simon also
says Barry returned 20 minutes later to deliver some inflammatory rhetoric,
allegedly having told Simon that “Players like you who take 10 minutes to
re-raise with the nuts should be banned from poker.”
Trumper also insists what Barry perceived as a “slow roll”
of his invincible hand was a misunderstanding. Trumper: “At the bottom I have
the 10-8 of diamonds, at the top I have the A-8 of spades, but I couldn't
remember which order they were in…I turn the top two cards over. It just so
happens, the 8 was the first card. It goes 8-A.” This seems to contradict the
scene painted by Greenstein which portrays Simon Trumper’s actions as
offensive to Poker.
Greenstein was so adamant about his complaint that he brought it to tournament
director Johnny Grooms, who spoke about the matter with Trumper. This is what
brought about Groom’s conversation with the other players present, where they
seemed to contradict Greenstein’s perception of the incident.
While both sides have been heard, it’s unlikely anyone who
wasn’t there will ever really be sure what took place. Controversy aside, it’s
clear that Trumper made an effective play if Greenstein was willing to push
all his chips in. He seems to feel that his acting was part of his read on
Greenstein; whether his behaviour was appropriate or not, it would appear that
his read was good, because he put Greenstein on a hand that would be very
difficult to get away form. Hopefully the two players will resolve their
issues, and we can get back to business as usual.
|