Side Pots Explained





Side Pots Explained

© 2006 Randy Saylor

Have you played online poker and noticed two separate virtual piles of chips in the middle of the table? Have you seen an all-in situation where one player clearly wins the hand, but two (or more) players receive chips after the showdown? Perhaps you’ve played live in a casino and seen this phenomenon. The explanation is the “side pot,” and this article explains the rules for calculating and distributing side pots.

It is the “table stakes” aspect of poker that allows a player to continue playing in a hand even if they run out of chips. Although minimum and maximum buy-ins are established for most poker games, after a player sits in, the size or their stack is not limited, either on the high or low side. Instead, each hand is played for “table stakes,” meaning an individual player can only risk what they have in front of them.

If the betting and raising of a particular hand means that the player will run out of chips before calling the bet, they are permitted to go all in with only their remaining chips. The other players are not limited in their betting by this; they may continue to bet and raise as long as the rules of the game allow. Instead, the dealer (or poker site software) creates a side pot for the other players with chips remaining.

Side Pots in Fixed-Limit Games

Side pots should be relatively rare in limit games; fortunately for regular poker players, they are not. Because of the fixed betting structure, a player will never need more than 12 big bets to play out a hand in a limit game. (This assumes a standard three-raise cap on each betting round; some casinos have different rules.)

A player with proper awareness and bankroll discipline will not ever allow their stack to drop below 12 big bets. This is so they can win the maximum in every hand in the odd case of a fully bet hand. If they have a temporary loss, but wish to remain at a good table, they use the “add more chips” feature of the online poker software to replenish their stack.

If a player has less than twelve big bets at the table, they are probably playing above their bankroll and gambling, are multi-tabling and not paying attention, or just lost a big hand and haven’t re-bought yet. Two of these three players can be taken advantage of. You should be alert for short stacks at limit tables.

Unlimited heads-up raising is another reason for the all-in at a limit table. Some sites and cardrooms allow two players to raise each other repeatedly if that round of betting began with only those two. These situations are relatively rare. A typical situation for it might be straight flush versus ace-high flush, or quads versus nut full house. Make sure you have the absolute stone-cold nuts before you commit your entire stack in one of these situations.

Side Pots in Pot-Limit and No-Limit Games

All-ins are relatively common in these games. A good player should have the maximum allowable buy-in at all times. Most poker rooms allow a buy-in of 100 times the big blind, or $200 in a $1/2 blinds game. If a player loses more than a few dollars of this $200, they are costing themselves the opportunity to win the maximum if they can get action on a monster hand.

Side Pots in Tournaments

Side Pots are also quite common in tournaments. If a small stack goes all-in for a small amount of chips, two larger stacks might then tangle for a side pot that might be much larger than the main pot. Even if you think the small stack will win the main pot, is may still be advantageous to attack the side pot aggressively.

One situation to watch out for in a tournament is making a stealing move with a short stack in the blinds. If you are tempted to make a steal with a short stack in the big blind, compare their remaining chips to the size of the pot. They might just call with any two cards because the pot odds will be there. Consider your ideal table image carefully here. You want to avoid showing down bad cards if you are trying to appear tight, so don’t make this move if you suspect you will be heads-up against an all-in.