Phil's exploits are just a show, he's a ratings machine, same with Mike. Based purely on poker Phil is better, He doesn't give his chips away, and has great control over his emotions you hardly ever see him tilt or steam in a way that would affects the quality of his play. Personally I can't stand either of them... If I want to see something funny I'd watch Phil Laak or Humberto Brenas or Negraenu just to be amazed |