View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-06, 09:13 AM
BSgutshot's Avatar
BSgutshot BSgutshot is offline
Champion
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 540
BBP Points: 0
Send a message via AIM to BSgutshot
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hayden1009
here is a thought ....why not kill the freerolls for oh say a month and only have the buyin and the top 5 in the buyins get into the weekly freeroll if they post for a period of 4 weeks....

after 4 weeks they need to make the top 5 again for another 4 week grace.

this allows for players who are serious to play cuz they have to do the buyin
and it also means they have to post 50 points in a week as well....

I think if you do this its less chance of a leak....someone who buys in and plays to the top 5 then does the necessary posting would in my opinion be less likely to give a password that they worked so had to get...

And i know this might seem like extra work for whomever sets up the eligible list but of you have 5 buyins then barring anyone making the final 5 more then once you will have 20 people in the first freeroll...the list of peeple will be short,. and to make things more interesting you could even have say if a player makes top 5 in 2 buy ins in a month then the player who took 6th could then be allowed to make the posts that get them into the following freeroll....this would keep those interesting in the tournys also close to the forum and active...
That sounds a bit confusing and complex. Do you really think having 1 freeroll every once in awhile is worth it? I say just stick with having all events be buy-in events. It will make it more clear to the paricipants in the league and the organizers of it as well.
__________________
Never move all-in with Q-6.